Convergence in Law

Author

John Robin Inston

Published

September 25, 2026

0.1 Convergence in Law

Convergence in Law, also known as convergence in distribution or weak convergence is the fourth and weakest type of convergence of random variables.

A sequence of random variables \(\{X_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\) on probability space \((\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mathbb{P})\) is said to converge in law (or converge in distribution) to \(X\) as \(n\to \infty\), denoted \(X_{n}\stackrel{\mathcal{D}}{\to}X\) if \[ \lim_{ n \to \infty } F_{X_{n}}(x)=F_{X}(x), \] that is, their sequence of [[distribution-function|distribution functions]] converge.

We note the following key points and observations about convergence in law:

  1. Unlike other types of convergence (a.s., norm, probability) convergence in law tells us nothing about the behavior of the random variables themselves, only their distribution. See [[files-notes-pstat213bc-lecture-notes-raya-pdf|PSTAT213BC Lecture Notes (Raya), page 32]] for an explanatory example.

  2. Convergence in law means that \(F_{n}(x) \to F(x)\) for all \(x\) up to the points of discontinuity of \(F\).

  3. Limits in distribution are unique, that is \(F_{n}(x) \to F(x)\) and \(F_{n}(x) \to G(x)\) then \(F=G\). ### Convergence in Probability \(\implies\) Convergence in Law

If \(X_{n}\stackrel{{\mathbb{P}}}{\to}X\) as \(n \to \infty\), then \(X_{n}\stackrel{\mathcal{D}}{\to}X\) as \(n\to \infty\).

\begin{proof} For every \(x \in\mathbb{R}\), \(\epsilon>0\) we have that \[ \mathbb{P}(X\leq x-\epsilon)\leq \liminf_{n \to \infty } \mathbb{P}(X_{n}\leq x)\leq \limsup_{ n \to \infty }\mathbb{P}(X_{n}\leq x)\leq \mathbb{P}(X\leq x+\epsilon). \] If \(x\) is a continuity point of \(X\), then as \(\epsilon\downarrow 0\), the left and right sides converge and hence \[ \lim_{ n \to \infty } \mathbb{P}(X_{n}\leq x)=P(X\leq x), \] giving the result.\end{proof} ### Skorohod's Representation Theorem

Skorohod’s Representation Theorem is a result showing that a convergent in law sequence of probability measures whose limit measure is sufficiently well-behaved can be represented as the distribution / law of a pointwise convergent sequence of random variables defined on a common probability space.

Suppose that \(X_{n}\stackrel{\mathcal{D}}{\to}X\) as \(n \to \infty\) with \(F_{n}(x):=\mathbb{P}(X_{n} \leq x)\) and \(F(x):=\mathbb{P}(X\leq x)\) for \(x \in \mathbb{R}\). Then, there exists a probability space \((\Omega', \mathcal{F}',\mathbb{P}')\) and random variables \(\{Y_{n}, n\geq 1\}\) and \(Y\) such that \[ Y_{n}\stackrel{\mathcal{D}}{=}X_{n},\quad Y\stackrel{\mathcal{D}}{=X}, \] for every \(n\) and \(Y_{n}\stackrel{a.s.}{\to}Y\) as \(n \to \infty\).

0.2 Key Results

With convergence of distribution functions we consider the following questions:

  1. Does a sequence of d.f.s \(\{ F_{n} \}\) necessarily converge?
  2. If a sequence of d.f.s \(\{ F_{n} \}\) converges to a function \(F\): \(F_{n}(x) \to F(x)\) is the limit \(F\) necessarily a distribution function?
    • In general, no, the space of distribution functions is not compact.
  3. When is the limit \(F\) (of a sequence of d.f.s \(\{ F_{n} \}\)) is a proper d.f.?
    • When \(\{ F_{n} \}\) is tight.

Continuous Mapping Theorem

Portmanteau Theorem

Helly's Selection Theorem

Tightness ##### Prohorov’s Theorem

1 Backlinks

Back to top